Message :
All bigots should be exterminated. All ugly bitch should be exterminated through sacred process of free fair competition, free from government's intervention against consensual acts. Then only girls as thin, pretty, modest, humble, meek, unpretentious and exhibitionistic as supermodel and porn star will survive in the gene pool making our world a much more beautiful place.
1. The importance of being hostile to any envy vermins that we found.
2. I want to prevent this from happening to other people from making other mistake of thinking that someone like that Katherine Trimble is a friend.
3. Clear up the name of our friend against a very determined slander campaign made by that bag against our friend. In case you see her slander, this is the story from our point of view so you listen from both sides. This is only if you know my friend's name. If not never mind. Not that it matters any more but we really feel to get this of.
I got a friend of mine that is a successful entrepreneur. He is trying to be one of the most well connected individual in the whole world one way or another to impress his mentors.
The beldam, like all the others, friendly replied. If any doesn't reply friendly, we would have noted it and avoid problem.
My friend is so happy founding many new friends. Then he noticed a feature in the network called "friend of friend" that refer to someone in your network's network. He friendly contacts his "friends of friends" while properly giving credit to his first degree friend. You know messages like:
>Dear ****,
>
>Hi,
>
>I found out that you are a friend of my friend, (a person's name). Well any friend of (that person) should be my friend too.
>
>Hope things are working out in ...
>
>Happy networking,
>
>******
The person is of course just try to be polite and friendly to everyone. He's just trying to impress a millionaire how automation can replace jobs of thousands of low IQ bigots. The only reason why the bigot name is on his list is because of a bug and her own friendly communication.
That's it. No threat or fraud. Not even a selling or service. Nothing. The term friend of friend is simply the official definition. My friend just want to network. That looks friendly enough. What sort of demon incarnated/possessed hell bound lost soul could get offended by such a friendly message.
Apparently that biddy forgot that she is in each others' network with my friend. So,
She got mad at him. Send him an email saying she is very angry.
She insisted that she never communicated.
She told him not to contact her again.
In public she publishes this:
>BEWARE: Spam using my name is doing the rounds
>
>If any of my network buddies find themselves getting a mesage from someone proporting to be "a great friend of Kat Trimble" PLEASE >IGNORE IT.
>
>Someone is using this ruse to get to all my network contacts -
>on the premise that he is a great friend of mine.
>
>This is not how I network (of course not, what's her IQ?)
>and I am sorry that you have targeted in this manner
loathe spam messages. If I connect you with any of my
>valued contacts believe me you'll get a message from me first, or a personal introduction face to face.
>
>This is a first for me. Be wary - you might be next
>
>Yours in fury!
At first we thought that this must be a misunderstanding. Maybe the bitch must have thought that she was actually important. We've tried to explain that but her IQ doesn't seem to be high enough to get it.
She publish that my friend is a spammer possibly without ensuring first that her accusation match the official policy of spam in the network.
The official rule for spam in the network is: Spam Un-invited promotion of products and services with no thought or attention to networking. Which is far from what my friend did. Many people emailed him showing support telling that he did nothing wrong.
Also, let's get realistic here. Sure my friend is wrong to credit that monster as a friend. But that is not a pretense. She friendly replied, and the term friend of friend is simply the official definition in the network. Also, with his connections, she needs to be a pope for accusation of using her name to gain unearned trust and fraud her friends to make any sense at all.
Apparently this idiot cannot differentiate between people having fraudulent intent and those just trying to be friendly. Or may be he knows, and deliberately use vague terms.
I guess all ugly bitches are dangerous. Since then when we see ugly women we just run away. Looks to me the bigot got the habit of making vague accusation to create false light on any situation, possibly to look important because she's not. Any one doing business with her must have wanted to scam people. Why else would they deal with such dubious bitches.
If she doesn't want to be credited as friend, she'll do well by not feigning friendliness. What can be gained for pretending to be her friend anyway? What makes the vermin think she's so special? Racism? If there is any dishonest assholes that pretend to be anyone's friend, it's that bitch.
And of course she doesn't network like he did. What's her IQ? Now how can he show this attention whore all this without damaging her fragile ego and set her off even more?
The more ridiculous an accusation, the more cognitive dissonant people feel when you try to explain. The more intensive the accusers have to maintain the beliefs. People don’t crave the truth; they crave prejudices that serve their interests. That’s why we have religions. Never underestimate the awesome power of bullshit accusations or beliefs.
True misunderstanding can be sorted out. Prejudiced motivated ones will provoke even more anger and violent from those who try to oppose it. Explanation is simply not the way to go.
My friend is quite confused why he is accused of spamming despite the official policy and why it causes so much anger given that it's kind of harmless, but he apologized anyway. My friend then friendly apologized and tries to explain.
...
>But we did have a chat before and I remember your pic. Maybe next time I should just say I am a member of Katherine's network?
...
>What other mistakes do I have made here?
...
>Sorry
>Just don't get too mad okay?
It is clear from my friend's friendly message that the sort of act will not be repeated. I mean, maybe he made a mistake. The old hag reply:
>You are not in my chosen network. We have not talked/chatted and I do not
>like the way you ramp up your connections (envy seems to be her main motive).
>People are not happy (I guess low IQ must have come in package with illusion of psychic power possesion.) with what
>you have done, they are just being polite. (if they're not happy why not just say so?)
>
>I do not choose to be in your network and will not consider you being in
>mine.
>
>
>Please do not contact me again. The damage (what damage? How much money is lost?) is already done and you are
>entirely responsible for your current reputation.
My friend is confused. He wanted to ask more questions but think that he should just leave this crazy thing alone. At that time the old beldam has publicly damaged my friend's reputation though. He needs to stop the bad mouthing which he thought is caused by misunderstanding. He also wants to keep this issue private to avoid mutual embarrassment. All while politely pointing out that she's really not that important for any reasonable businessman to pretend to be her friend as she claimed. So her claim that anyone would pretend to be her friend is ridiculous.
So he wrote:
>I don't mind your comments about me as long as it is true. So keep in mind that we did chat in a friendly way and we were indeed in
>each other network, which you can check, before saying anything about me. Also, *******'s definition of spamming is trying to sell
>something without intent to network which is far from what I do.
>I'll try to get both of us disconnected. ...you could have understood and tell me privately like Peter did. Then we could have really been
>friend. It's a tragedy, but I got 400+ other friends to concentrate on.
He wanted to response to the scoundrel's public accusation but at that time, the gorgon's ranting has incited enough people to get his account blocked preventing him to do that. Before, he didn't receive any single complaint.
Now this might have been a big mistake. What sort of thing an ugly lonely old hag would ppppppee ppe phhheeeeeeeeeeelllllll when she realized she's not a miss universe?... And I used to think Kobe is wrong.
Then she wrote:
>Put me in front of a concrete wall. Let my bash my head against it. What are we dealing with here? Arrogance, stupidity, a language >barrier?
>This was sent to my personal email address this morning. I would very much like to know what your response would be to this person! It >is the ubiquitous ***** AGAIN.
>I have never chatted to or had any discussion with this person. I find his spamming methods completely unacceptable. I have
>complained, but it has served no purpose.
>Our main concern is to get rid of people like this. Your smugness is a little premature
>Thanks ***** - and to all of you who exposed this little **** for what he really was
>It really is hilarious. What a sad, sad little man he is
>Have a look at yesterday's thread on this Nina. It's not as innocent as you think
>But as Jim said - some of the oddballs on here are like bindweed.
>Reputation: 0 (this is not true. As a medalist in international physics olympiad and many other math competition, and a successful capitalist that built business from scratch into one of the fastest growing business in the world, my friend naturally has a very significant reputation. He also actively promotes capitalism, free trade, individual freedom, and woman's right while preventing discrimination, frictions, church burning, and other parasitic behaviors. In the network, he got 400+ network members, 112 good rating. Which that thing has known before claiming he has 0 reputation. That is far more members and good rating in 2-3 days than what the number that harpy has built for years)
>LOL Paul! My God, does this specimen ever stop? What Planet is he on? Wil we ever see the back of him?
>As a cat lover I feel we must mount a rescue mission to save ****** from this sad, bewildered person!
>This is unreal, isn't it
All this while my friend cannot do anything to publicly reply to explain his side of the story. It's amazing to see the determination of undesirable old hags with nothing positive things to offer to regain the self respect their genes denied them. Another even uglier old hag even fantasized and publicly accused my friend, which live half a globe away, for stalking.
It seems that the uglier the female, the more creative they are at bumping up the little self worth they have.
Who wants to stalk those specimens? Who wants to sleep with that thing even if he's paid? The whole point of making a lot of money is so we don't end up with one of those even for an hour. Why in the  ing earth that trot complaint that she's afraid of being stalked?
You can approach the prettiest goddess and the worse you get is a “no” answer (guess what’s the best?). You can claim that rich highly reputable businessmen are your friend, and the worse you can get is a polite objection.
Yet, you don’t even have to approach ugly beldam to get stalking accusation. And a sick no body will make a big deal of friendly messages.
Not only that, an unknown married male sympathizer, Mitch, which is probably over represented in the gene pool, accuse my friend for not being able to get chicks. That accusation is not true of course.
What the is wrong with British people? Well, I'll tell you straight here. Real males aim for as many females as possible. In western civilization, that means outside marriage. Marriage is a highly cost inefficient prostitution still done mainly due to huge government’s intervention on our private life causing one of the most obnoxious market distortion ever. It's part of our mission to free everyone from such stupid obsolete institution that typically last till bitter divorce do them part anyway.
We can only wonder what sort of insidious dark whatever resides on those vermin mind. Maybe she thinks slandering is a cheap way to get publicity on her otherwise lonely and dark life that she turned a small friendly mistake into a big problem. Maybe she's just dumb. Who knows?
Then my friend found a copy of Katherine’s own message to her.
>Hi [My Friends' name]
>
>Many thanks for your message.
>
>Remind me what *** is again?
>
>There are some networks that I simply don't bother with anymore.
>
>Best wishes
>
>Katherine
May be this is a misunderstanding. May be she forgot. We try to solve this peacefully by showing her her own message. Another friend asks her whether she wrote her own friendly message or not. My friend is told to just get a life, which is very rude.
When someone that hear about this show her message in public, she said she's not mad (which is a lie, her private message clearly says she is very angry). She said she ignore this sort of thing. Well, this article wouldn't be here if she ignore small things.
We gently explain our case and ask for explanation and the bitch simply point that my friend is so stupid he can't differentiate a friendly reply from a "sod of". Well, she’s so stupid (or pretend she is) that she can’t differentiate between people trying to be friendly and people trying to fraud her friends by pretending to be her friend.
We don't what "sod off" mean. So maybe she's quite right that my friend is dumb at some areas. You know what? We usually tolerate that, knowing those who speak against us are usually just sad morons. However, now that those morons can convince enough other morons to make quite an impact, we don't like that.
So we call our lawyers in England only to found out that house of common has not legalized exterminating obnoxious vermins.
We'll just have to do this the civilized way. That thing asks for everyone's opinion and wanting some hostile public argument, we'll give her one.
It's about time this bitch fights someone that fights back. Also we change our anger toward compassion for any companies that waste their money hiring this dumb thing.
Because of her act, a small number of people that have not listen to the other side got mad. That small number of people attracted the attention of one of the chief executive, which is the asshole's friend. The small minded worm, out of favoritism use out of context misquotation from almost never visited joke page of my friend's personal homepage as a pretext to kick my friend out of the network. That guy will need to redefine his definition of enormous damage.
Oh ya, a person that tries to sort this out peacefully are also kicked out of the network for "Provoking issues that [the CE] has made decision"
It's for a good thing actually. Now we do not have to tone down our response at all. I bet this way we can write even more provoking articles.
At first we thougth that the CE must have had another missunderstanding. However, his reluctant to explain why he claims my friend is spamming despite the official policy, his unusual heroic act to prevent my friend from publishing his side of the story to protect the bitch's reputation, and his insistence that my friend don't contact certain people suggest that the real cause must be favoritism. Who knows what she had on him. We're told not to contact him again. So, we'll just find that out really soon through some other ways.
His insistence to protect that vermin's reputation forced us to postpone doing it for 1.5 year. Of course, postponing this for 1 year allow us to do this bigger... Why not tag along some social values we believe in.
In fact it is quite obvious that it's the bitch that break the official rules of
"however, we will not tolerate aggression or rudeness towards an individual."
"Members should be polite and courteous in their written tone"
"Abusive Behavior: All forms of personal attack whether in public or via network messaging"
All this are of course ignored by the CE due to favoritism.
My friend then lost a significant portion of his network and need to build his own entirely different networking system. Also he lost his reputation as problem solver that used to be able to bring big result without any significant problem. All because of thinking that the old biddy is her friend and making some small friendly gestures based on that erroneous thinking.
What can set of this walking time bomb. Over what? Fraud? Thief? Rape (not that anyone will do that to her)? No. These things blow up over a few friendly gestures.
A long time passed and we're all busy doing other things. Strange puzzles keep floating.
Why a friend that tries to peacefully sort this thing out also got kicked out of the network?
Another asks what's the real problem is and no one want to answer.
They all just say that my friend is wrong without explaining objective questions raised into it?
Why the CE works so hard to prevent my friend from publicizing his side of the story? Why no one answer why my friend is accused of spamming despite the official policy that differs from what he did?
Than a few stuffs start clicking into places. This is not a misunderstanding case. They knew it all along.
They knew that my friend did not have any intensive to pretend to be anyone's friend as accused.
Hitler also knew that the Jews didn't start the second world war. He did. And the Germans have enough evidence to guess that too. They just like to believe stuffs that boost their ego.
Some would argue that we should just let angry parasites to keep their ego.
However, letting the inferiors that are on our way to keep their ego is the very reason why parasites outnumber productive people nowadays. We've seen that it doesn't work.
When we call euphemistically call retards: special people, we improve their perceived market value making them look more desirable than they really are. Then they attract sex partners and produce more retards.
I think a better way is to just show them the truth. Humans are simply not equal and we vary in capability. Those who fail under free trade capitalism are simply inferior.
The more offended they are the better. That means subconsciously they know we're right. Let's hit those parasites in the only place it can still hurt. Their ego.
In middle age, the religious leaders also knew that the Jews did not have any intensive to kill Jesus; the religious leaders, whose influenced are undermined by Jesus, did. The other Europeans should have known, they just like beliefs they want to hear.
The Indonesian's officials also knew that it's not the Chinese or capitalism that ruin the economy; the officials' corruptions and governments involvements in economy did. And the poor knows that too... It's just that the poor need some justification for looting which they want to do.
All politicians and religious leaders also know that all sex laws, and regulations, and romance indoctrination's effects are to ration females to less desirable males. This reduces the gene pool survival of the best and brightest while forcing females to settle for less desirable males. The rest of the population sort of know too, it's just that they want a share of those females so they just fell along to this irrational romance believe. They just mumble all the way about religion and morality that doesn't make sense.
Many of us also know that societies often have far less compunction to slaughter the extremely productive rather than the extremely parasitic. In many countries, the most productive people are taxed or slaughtered to support the parasites. Yet, people would go to great length arguing that serial killers, thieves, robbers, burglars shouldn't be put to death or punished heavily.
The true reason is that the most productive people are, at least arguably, "superior" more capable people they do not want to compete with in the gene pool. They love those thieves, robbers and other parasites because the parasites share their genes and preferences.
We can appease people' need for food and shelter. The world is so abundance thanks to the exceptionally capable and productive. It may still make sense to appease the true need of the truly needy.
However, when we try to we appease people's jealousy, when will it end? There'll be no end to it short of communism and we've seen what happen to those who go there. If we appease people's need to make kids without affording it there'll be just more and more poverties.
When we regulate consensual acts that effectively ration human beings, usually females, to less desirable sex partners rather than giving full choices to those humans to give and take any kind of consensual offers, we're not just shooting our foot, we're inhuman. When we do all of these, when will it end? The less capable will just keep growing in number and soon no one capable and willing enough to be productive is left.
To the opposite many other common irrational and subjectivity that plagued the dumb prejudiced people explains away their behavior.
Let's get back to our sample. That thing already attacked my friend publicly, might as well go all the way to safe her face.
Or perhaps, the real problem is that the asshole is an undesirable lonely crazy old hag with nothing to lose and is very dangerous to deal with. She's the kind of females, sperm donors would want to exclude from recipient list. Our guess is confirmed by her own writing:
>"A friend of mine asked me a question today, and it made me think about this thorny subject yet again.
>"Why is it" she asked me "that women who have had children cannot comprehend women who don't want them".
>As someone who has found herself defending her choice over and over again, I knew exactly what she meant. Why should I have to >defend myself? I have been villified by men too for my choice. Is this fair?"
That bitch work as a copy writer. Maybe she's afraid that all of her clients will go to competitors, say Asians?
We checked some of her writing and found that her writings are so banal, forgettable, boring, drap, and insignificant, which is kind of expected from her relatively lower intelligence. It's unbelievable that this speciment can get away making a living as a copywriter in any civilized nation with significant IQ.
Finally, perhaps my friend did something that offends that vermin's feeling of importance. Well, maybe he should have been more careful with her ego? Wait a minute. Enough is enough. He's been polite and diplomatic enough. Excessive compassionate understanding to enemies and parasites will convert friends and productive people to be parasites.
Compassion is a way we lure others to be good to us. Compassion toward those with little positive to offer, and a lot of negative to pound is just genetic genocide. Don't repeat his mistake. Why difficultly try to compassionately understand? In many cases, obviously including this one, I found it easier to just judge.
To the opposite, we have a better idea.
It's been years we wanted to see the world, where the best and brightest can just soar to the sky without having to be impeded by parasites around them. That way, smart people will get rich through productivity rather than having to resort to corruption and dictatorships. So it’s for everyone’sgood.
I am sick and tired to see that we don't play in equal playing field.
Why some people, after receiving reasonably enough chance to build great financial empire, doesn't have to be productive to receive money through welfare?
Why some business, do not have to compete globally and provide the best offer to win customers due to government's protection?
Why some humans are allowed to make more kids than they can afford expecting society to pay for those kids. This while those that are taxed to support those kids are prevented to make as many kids as they can afford through various regulations?
Why the one get screwed by the law, is often the most capable and productive, while benefiting the parasites?
If smart people don't unite against these super parasites, we'll be gone.
Thieves, robbers, and rapists are forgiven for heinous acts yet the productive are punished for every little infraction. Everett O. Lasher of Seattle, Washington, for example, is forced to shot himself in Tax Court after being told that he was going to be fined $5,000 for raising "frivolous" arguments before the "court." This while murderers of Vincent Chin gets off with $3000 fine.
All this effectively hurt the most productive best and brightest humans, in favor of the less capable parasites.
This happen because the smartest of us don't strike back. If we hear an argument that the rich has obligation to help the poor, the correct response is not to agree with it.
The correct response is to realize that such opinion correlate with financial irresponsibility and lack of productivity. Obviously these vermins are not entirely objective. We shouldn't appease our oppressors. No!
We should remove the morality handicap that we have to the extend they remove theirs. Then we'll get down to their level and strike back.
If you're a jew, try painting Dave's star in Nazis' graves.
That's the right response if we want to ensure that the most productive and capable humans will be the majority in the gene pool 1000 years from now. If gene pool survival is not proportional with at least the square root of economic contribution, what's the point of making money? (All right, I'll settle for cubic root, we can always make more money.) If productive people are taxed to support the parasites' kids, why not become parasites?
We have to put others' interest in mind first if we want them to act in our favor. If we're not selfish, why should others appease us positively? If those that preach lies and prejudices against our interest and cause significant damage can do so with we’re answering back, why shouldn't they?
Niceness is weakness and compassion toward enemies is a mask for fear. Spending significant resources on nurturing others' kids is genetic suicide.
All the morality in the world and eventually everything goes back to this common denominator bottom line.
Sure Jesus teaches us to give the other cheek and love our enemy. See what happen to him? Unless your goal in life is atoning the sins of your inferiors you'd better hate your enemy and love yourself.
Getting rid of parasites that is genetically preprogrammed to instinctively get in the way those who are extremely productive will sure helps a lot.
For years, we've advocated vengeance toward parasites. For years we've wanted someone to steal our money again so we can set that vermin as a sample of what happen to vermins on our way. For years, we have no good sample... This bitch is our best sample so far. Not exactly fit our original description of the best sample, but the best we have. How can we promote vengeance for so many other prosecuted productive individuals yet not doing it our selves? Maybe they fear that vermin will strike back.
Well, if we are the best and brightest in the world, we have little to fear. That vermins have far less capability than us. We are stronger. We can win this. 1000 years from now, all humans will share our genes, not them. No one should serve other humans to the point it's no longer consensual or mutually beneficial. Na na.... They'd better pick of weaker victims.
Anyone that can make money productively can also rule violently.
We can strike back. We have to strike back for every violation of individual freedom that is put against us. For every prejudiced false nonsense irrational accusation aimed at us. We just have to strike back!
We communicate with some of that bitches' friend and figure out that she's counting on connections rather than service quality to get customers. Heh heh... Weakness! Should have spied on your enemies before blasting out your angers to them right?
Knowing that the real case could be the inferior' providers' desire to eliminate competition, we'll give them what they fear the most.
At first, we're thinking of just screwing her life. But then, it's not worth our time. So, we build a huge system moving any job that can be done online, including copywriting, to anyone willing to do it cost effectively in the other continent.
It's something that'll happen sooner or latter anyway through normal market mechanism. It'll take a while to implement. We have quicker goal to achieve.
No European company will ever need to cost inefficiently spend money, and risk nonsense wrath, for the like of that bitch. We'll connect any companies that are in need of copy writer to cheaper, better, and SAFER alternatives.
It's not really our intention to destroy that vermins life. However, I bet that's what she'll tell everyone what we're going to do.
I bet, by now, she's already telling everyone that we intend to kill her. Hell, I bet she'll tell everyone that we intend to rape her to increase her self worth.
Who would bother checking that we live half a globe away where chicks 10 time as pretty costs much less per session (My president will thank me for mentioning this). Not to mention those highly intelligence, rich, self sustaining, independent, pretty females, who are all effectively free whores for the genetically superior best and brightest rich smart alpha males cock. Don't belive me? Ask Matt Ridley.
That's the point of being pretty. To be able to extract higher quality genetic material and larger amount of financial resources from superior cocks. This is something ugly bitches won't understand. Which is why ugly females and poor males often promote sex regulation and family value. I'll tell you the truth. Within 5 years, you'll laugh if anyone still swears by the moon and the star in the sky in the name of bull shit romance.
Any males that want to survive in the gene pool have to be available to as many females as possible. We can always donate sperm to those we don't want to sleep with.
According to Richard Dawkins, humans maximize the interest of their genes. So women will vote the interest of the highest quality males they can get. So, if rich smart productive males are not available to enough females, females that can't aim high will promote the interest of lesser cocks in the form of socialism. Available to as many females as possible will ensure that smart rich alpha males' causes are supported by females vote. Then capitalism will be the norm once again.
The alpha males’ burden is then to save as many pretty chickz as possible from getting knocked up by lesser cocks. For every pretty chickz we waste, that'll be one more chicks getting impaled by financially irresponsible males that'll produce next generation anti WTO commies.
The other males can go them self or jerk of.
Obviously this is victimless.
Of course, if some women insist on getting lesser cocks in the name of romance, I won't stop them. That kind of preferences will be out from the gene pool within a few generations anyway, if it's still exist today.
In fact that's the real reason why we promote feminist movement and females' freedom all the way. If you believe in your genes' quality, you should give females the choices they've been bitching for centuries. Then those highly desirable objects will ration themselves to the best and brightest genes to get knocked up.
Men are not equal. Let females choose and they'll choose the best.
Nevertheless, there is no way we can explain that's not our intent to those short tempered morons.
Might as well tell the truth nothing but the truth without bother appeasing.
In fact, for an even more ego boost, we won't even bother mentioning our name in this article. I am sure many vermins would love to boost our ego by trying to find that out. Ah........ Ego.... Would some vermins please boost mine? Who am I? Guess who?
We won't use our extensive credibility. The arguments should stand by it self.
Hopefully, she'll kill herself giving more breathing room for the rest of us. How else can we kick this thing out of our back? If we can successfully destroy all these vermins' miserable life, we can end all discrimination in the world. Who's with me?
In fact, if you're that bitch's customers, why not email us and we'll refer you for free plus ask discount to other better copywriters. We'll safe you from her short tempered wrath.
If you're a copy writer that believe that you're good but need connection, let us know.
The only companies that still use that bitch's service after this will be racist imbeciles that want to be associated with dumb short tempered assholes.
An expert in gene pool survival techniques argues that exterminating short tempered, mean, and intolerance people that get in the way of the best and brightest will actually improve the economy for the rest of us. Not that we're going to encourage that of course being that we're the good guys even to those vermins. However, there is surely one reasonable way to find out for those who are curious enough.
Avoiding those monsters are perfectly lawful ways to ensure that future generations will have much less of these Nazis wannabe to deal with. Someone got to give those Nazis a taste of their medicine long before they got out of hand. In turn this will make the world a much better place for the rest of us.
If you know anyone that still use her service, please tell us so we can save them. After reading this, anyone still using her service must be as deranged as her, but we won't interfere with that.
Also, if you fear thieves, robbers, and burglars, and if you're tired paying tax to support someone else kids that's genetically pre-destined to put gun in your head one day, please tell us list of their conviction records to be blasted on the net to help honest businessmen separate out the chaff from the wheat. For years, we've wanted to this but have always been persuaded from it by people that think such act will be cruel.
Well, that vermin has so graciously convinced us that we can never be too vindictive in this world.
Can't we see? The best and brightest will always be on top anyway. If not through honest productive capitalist, it'll be through corruption or depotism.
Should we fail to give the best and brigthests in the world fail to get what they meritocraticly deserve, than the best and brightest will use their superior brains to enslave the rest of the world rather than productively serve society.
If we see the amount of damage Suharto, Saddam, George Bush, and Mao Tze Tung do to world economies, one thing is obvious. Excessively getting in the way of the best and brightest from achieving greatness through productivity is very dangerous. Societies will be better of to just let the worthless die and kill parasites instead of that. Long live capitalism!
If productive people face riots, and genocice. If honest productive people are taxed and businessmen making a few friendly remarks ran into bad publicity problem. Why shouldn't parasites that cause significant damage maliciously at least face bad publicity problem?
Let the potential employer decide whether the employee is worth employing or not based on correct information.
The following will help driving ugly bitches out of genepool:
1. Promote porn. Many males would rather watch porn for the whole of their life rather than marrying ugly women.
2. Promote women emancipation, including if the woman want to fight as soldiers in front line war, if and only if she's ugly. That way they can all happily die for "nobler" cause, or whatever. It's a great place for unemployed males that suck on our tax money too.
3. Legalize all consenusal sex and all jobs hot babes are good at, like blowjob for money, so no pretty woman has to be a soldier.
4. Promote death penalty to thieves. Ugly women are less likely to marry rich productive males. Getting rid of thieves will greatly reduce welfare costs.
5. Post thieves conviction record all over the internet so thieves can never get job. So far we only managed to do that to 1.5 millions. We got to save our wealth and if that means exterminating vermins so what? Thieves are dying anyway, deservingly. Soon many will come up with ways to further speeding up thieves extermination and our wealth will be saver.
6. Encourage women traficking so all pretty women in poor countries can mate with richer males rather than being forced to wear ninja clothes to hide their assets or got their clits cut by anti competitive male bigots. Hell even kunoichi nowaday wear sexier clothes. It'll also force ugly women in rich countries to compete with superior and cheaper speciments overseas.
Remember, as that beldam clearly shows, ugly bitches are dangerous and can cause significant problem. If they're not out of the gene pool, all of us are in great danger due to their vague lies and bullshit accusations.
Let's flattened up the playing field, one piece at a time. Long live globalization. Those who are not competitive are supposed to go extinct. Anything else is slavery.
|